Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. Research Domains
  3. Engineering
  4. Electrical Engineering
  5. Electrical Energy Storage
  6. Dura Versus Gore-tex As An Abdominal Wall Prosthesis In An Open And Closed Infected Model

Dura versus Gore-Tex as an abdominal wall prosthesis in an open and closed infected model

S Smith1, N Gantt, M I Rowe

  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213-2583.

Journal of Pediatric Surgery|June 1, 1989

Related Experiment Videos

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

In infected wounds, Gore-Tex (PTFE) demonstrated superior performance over dura for abdominal wall defect closure. PTFE showed better infection resistance, reduced patch separation, and fewer adhesions in contaminated settings.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Wound Healing Research

Background:

  • Large abdominal wall defects often require prosthetic materials for closure, especially in contaminated or infected wounds.
  • Choosing the appropriate prosthetic material is critical for successful wound healing and minimizing complications.
  • Gore-Tex (PTFE) and dura are potential materials for abdominal wall reconstruction, but their comparative efficacy in infected scenarios is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of Gore-Tex (PTFE) and dura in closing large abdominal wall defects.
  • To evaluate resistance to infection, patch separation, and intraperitoneal adhesion formation for both materials.
  • To determine the optimal prosthetic material for abdominal wall reconstruction in compromised wound environments.

Main Methods:

  • Ninety guinea pigs underwent full-thickness abdominal defects (2 cm2) patched with either PTFE or dura.
  • Wounds were managed under three conditions: open, aseptically closed, or contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and then closed.
  • Outcomes assessed included patch separation, retention, adhesion formation, and wound healing over 45 days.

Main Results:

  • Patch separation, retention, and adhesions were comparable between PTFE and dura in open and aseptically closed wounds.
  • In infected closed wounds, PTFE demonstrated significantly longer incision integrity, delayed patch separation, and improved overall patch retention compared to dura.
  • PTFE also significantly reduced intraperitoneal bowel adhesions in the infected closed wound model.

Conclusions:

  • Gore-Tex (PTFE) offers superior outcomes to dura for closing large abdominal wall defects in infected conditions.
  • PTFE's enhanced resistance to infection and reduced adhesion formation make it a more suitable prosthetic material for contaminated abdominal wounds.
  • These findings support the use of PTFE in complex abdominal wall reconstructions where infection risk is a concern.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies